论文题名(中文): | 包装材料、贮藏温度和灭菌处理对三种中式预制菜肴品质的影响 |
作者: | |
学号: | 2019050592 |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 0972 |
学科名称: | 农学 - 食品科学与工程(可授工学、农学学位) |
学生类型: | 专业硕士 |
学位: | 农业硕士 |
学校: | 延边大学 |
院系: | |
专业: | |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师学校: | |
论文完成日期: | 2022-08-18 |
论文答辩日期: | 2022-07-22 |
论文题名(外文): | Packaging materials, storage temperature and sterilization treatment Influence of three Chinese prefabricated food on their quality |
关键词(中文): | |
关键词(外文): | Chinese prepared dishes Packaging materials Storage temperature Sterilization methods Storage quality |
论文文摘(中文): |
为了保证预制食品的安全卫生及延长其货架期,本试验选取荤菜(炒牛肉)、素菜(木耳炒白菜)、荤素搭配(辣白菜炒猪肉)三种中式预制菜肴,测定了理化、微生物及感官指标,探讨了包装材料、贮藏温度、灭菌处理对其贮藏过程中品质的影响,主要研究结果如下: 首先,比较聚酯包装/聚丙烯包装(PET/PP)与聚酯包装/铝箔包装(PET/AL)在三种典型中式预制菜肴贮藏过程中对其品质的影响。结果表明:经不同包装处理后,三组样品的L*值、b*值、硬度、弹性、咀嚼性均随贮藏天数的延长而显著(P<0.05)下降,且PET/AL较PET/PP包装能更大程度保持样品的色泽及质构特性,其中PET/PP包装组中RB样品第9 d时硬度为5.33N,与PET/AL包装组第6 d时的硬度值相近。;三组样品的挥发性成分随贮藏时间的延长逐渐增多,且在贮藏第6 d时出现气味差异,PET/AL包装组中氮氧化合物和脂肪烃含氧衍生物的含量小于PET/PP包装组;脂质氧化指标和TVC值与贮藏天数呈正相关,且PET/AL较PET/PP包装组脂肪氧化程度小(P<0.05),在PET/PP包装组第12 d时各样品的TBA值已超过0.5 mg MDA/Kg,且TVC值在第9 d时已接近卫生标准临界值5.0×104CFU/g,且该处理组在第9 d时感官品质达到不可接受程度,而PET/AL包装组在第12 d时感官品质不可接受。 其次,样品经PET/AL包装后,比较常温(25℃)和冷藏(4℃)条件在贮藏过程中对样品品质的影响。结果表明:经不同温度贮藏,三组样品的L*值、b*值、硬度、弹性、咀嚼性均与贮藏天数呈正相关(P<0.05),且两处理组中冷藏环境可更有利于样品色泽及质构特性的稳定;三组样品的挥发性成分随贮藏时间的延长逐渐增多,且在贮藏第3 d时出现气味差异,冷藏处理组中氮氧化合物和低分子胺类物质的含量小于常温处理组;随贮藏天数的延长,各样品TBA值、AV值、POV值、TVC值逐渐增加(P<0.05),冷藏较常温环境可更明显延缓样品脂肪氧化程度(P<0.05),其中25℃处理组RB、SCS样品在贮藏第3 d时,POV值分别为3.21 meq/Kg、2.22 meq/Kg,且冷藏处理组贮藏第12 d时的TVC值与常温处理组贮藏第9 d时相近,而常温处理组第12 d时TVC值已接近卫生标准临界值,感官品质已达到不可接受程度,但冷藏处理组在贮藏第12 d时感官品质仍可接受。 再次,将三种样品制备后分别进行巴氏灭菌和臭氧灭菌处理,于冷藏(4℃)条件下贮藏,比较两种灭菌方式对样品贮藏过程中品质的影响。结果表明:经不同灭菌方式处理,三组样品的L*值、b*值、硬度、弹性、咀嚼性均随贮藏天数的延长而显著(P<0.05)下降,且臭氧灭菌处理组的上述指标较巴氏灭菌下降速度缓慢(P<0.05),巴氏灭菌处理组RB样品第9 d时L*值为43.27,与臭氧灭菌处理组第12 d时的L*值相近。随贮藏时间的延长,三组样品的挥发性成分逐渐增多,且在贮藏第6 d时出现气味差异,巴氏灭菌处理组中检测出的氮氧化合物及有机硫化物较臭氧灭菌处理组多;脂质氧化指标和TVC值随贮藏时间的延长逐渐增加,其中臭氧灭菌处理组中RB样品在贮藏第9 d时的AV值为0.29 mg KOH/Kg,而巴氏灭菌处理组为0.35 mg KOH/Kg,臭氧灭菌处理组脂肪氧化速率低于巴氏灭菌处理组(P<0.05),且更能提高贮藏期间微生物的安全性;感官评分均随贮藏天数的增加显著(P<0.05)下降,第12 d时,两处理组的感官品质为可接受程度,但在第9 d时,巴氏灭菌处理组的样品逐渐有油脂及汁水析出、蒸煮味加重,而臭氧灭菌处理组仍能在贮藏第12 d时保持良好品质。 关键词:中式预制菜肴;包装材质;贮藏温度;灭菌方式;贮藏品质 |
文摘(外文): |
In order to ensure the safety and health of the prepared food and extend its shelf life, this experiment selected three Chinese prepared dishes: meat dishes (roast beef), vegetable dishes (agaric cabbage), and meat and vegetable combination (spicy cabbage streaky pork). The physical, chemical, microbial and sensory indexes were measured, and the effects of packaging materials, storage temperature and sterilization treatment on the quality of the prepared food during storage were discussed. The main results are as follows: Firstly, the effects of polyester/polypropylene packaging (PET/PP) and polyester/aluminum foil packaging (PET/AL) on the quality of three typical Chinese prepared dishes during storage were compared. The results showed that the L* value, b* value, hardness, springiness and chewiness of the three groups of samples decreased significantly (P<0.05) with the extension of storage days after different packaging treatments, and PET/AL packaging could maintain the color and texture characteristics of the samples to a greater extent than PET/PP packaging; Among them, the hardness of RB samples in PET/PP packaging group at the 9th day was 5.33N, which was similar to that of PET/AL packaging group at the 6th day; The volatile components of the three groups of samples increased gradually with the extension of storage time, and the odor differences appeared on the 6th day of storage, the content of nitrogen oxides and aliphatic hydrocarbon oxygen-containing derivatives in PET/AL packaging group was lower than that in PET/PP packaging group; The lipid oxidation index and TVC value were positively correlated with the storage days, and the degree of fat oxidation in PET/AL was smaller than that in PET/PP packaging group (p<0.05). The TBA value of each sample in PET/PP packaging group had exceeded 0.5 mg MDA/Kg on the 12th day, and the TVC value was close to the critical value of health standard on the 9th day 5.0×104 CFU/g and the sensory quality of the treatment group reached an unacceptable level at the 9th day, while the sensory quality of the PET/AL packaging group was unacceptable at the 12th day. Secondly, after the samples were packed by PET/AL, the effects of normal temperature (25℃) and cold storage (4℃) on the quality of the samples during storage were compared. The results showed that the L* value, b* value, hardness, springiness and chewiness of the three groups were positively correlated with the storage days (P<0.05), and the cold storage environment was more conducive to the stability of the color and texture characteristics of the samples; The volatile components of the three groups increased gradually with the extension of storage time, and the odor differences appeared on the third day of storage, the contents of nitrogen oxides and low molecular amines in the cold storage group were lower than those in the normal temperature group; The TBA value, AV value, POV value and TVC value of the samples increased gradually with the extension of storage days (P<0.05), and the degree of lipid oxidation of the samples was more significantly delayed in cold storage than in normal temperature environment (P<0.05), The POV values of RB and SCS samples in the 25℃ treatment group were 3.21 meq/Kg and 2.22 meq/Kg respectively on the third day of storage, and the TVC value of the cold storage group on the 12th day of storage was similar to that of the normal temperature group on the 9th day of storage,on the 12th day, the TVC value of the normal temperature treatment group was close to the critical value of the hygienic standard, and the sensory quality had reached an unacceptable level, but the sensory quality of the cold storage group was still acceptable at the 12th day of storage. Thirdly, the three samples were pasteurized and ozone sterilized respectively, and then stored in cold storage (4℃) to compare the effects of the two sterilization methods on the quality of the samples during storage. The results showed that the L* value,b* value, hardness, springiness and chewiness of the three groups decreased significantly (P<0.05) with the extension of storage days, and the above indexes of the ozone sterilization group decreased more slowly than those of the pasteurization group (P<0.05); The L* value of RB samples in the pasteurization group at the 9th day was 43.27, which was similar to the L* value of RB samples in the ozone sterilization group at the 12th day. With the extension of storage time, the volatile components of the three groups of samples increased gradually, and the odor differences appeared on the 6th day of storage, the nitrogen oxides and organic sulfides detected in the pasteurization group were more than those in the ozone sterilization group; The lipid oxidation index and TVC value gradually increased with the extension of storage time. The AV value of RB samples in the ozone sterilization group at the 9th day of storage was 0.29 mg KOH/Kg, while that in the pasteurization group was 0.35 mg KOH/Kg. The fat oxidation rate of the ozone sterilization group was lower than that of the pasteurization group (P<0.05), and it could improve the microbial safety during storage; Sensory scores decreased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase of storage days, and the sensory quality of the two treatments was acceptable on the 12th day, but on the 9th day, the samples treated with pasteurization gradually released fat and juice, and the cooking taste was aggravated, while the samples treated with ozone sterilization could still maintain good quality on the 12th day of storage. Key words:Chinese prepared dishes; Packaging materials; Storage temperature; Sterilization methods; Storage quality
|
参考文献: |
[1] 张泓,黄峰.肉类预制菜肴加工中的品质形成与保持[J].肉类研究,2013,27(7):53-57.
﹀
[2] 冯月荣,樊军浩,陈松.调理食品现状及发展趋势探讨[J].肉类工业,2006,(10):36-39. [3] 张群.预制调理食品加工保质杀菌关键技术研究与应用[J].食品与生物技术学报,2019,38(03):160. [4] 刘景圣,刘美宏,谢佳函,等.方便即食食品研究现状与发展趋势[J].吉林农业大学学报,2018,40(04):511-516. [5] 侯汉学,董海洲,王兆升,等.国内外可食性与全降解食品包装材料发展现状与趋势[J].中国农业科技导报,2011,13(05):79-87. [6] 韦佩贝,戚穗坚.疫情全球化常态化趋势下中国预制调理食品市场发展现状[J].食品与机械,2020,36(09):18-25. [7] 赵钜阳,王萌,石长波.菜肴类预制调理食品的开发及品质研究进展[J].中国调味品,2019,44(08):193-196. [8] 胡涛.HMR与中国植物提取产业发展展望[J].中国民商,2019,(5):54,61. [9] Charles Eete.Morris.HMRs Challenge Manufactttrers[J],Food Engineering,1998(5):67-72. [10] 高振洪.自热食品菜肴包的杀菌技术研究及基于贮藏品质变化的货架期预测[D].浙江大学,2020. [11] 侯汉学,董海洲,王兆升,等.国内外可食性与全降解食品包装材料发展现状与趋势[J].中国农业科技导报,2011,13(05):79-87. [12] 张泓,张春江,张雪.提升我国传统菜肴加工业水平的主要途径[J].农业工程技术(农产品加工业),2012(9):28-33. [13] 金征宇.我国方便食品的现状与发展趋势[J].食品工业科技,2011,32(4):53-56. [14] 吕梦佳.饮食类非物质文化遗产的保护研究——以韩国博物馆泡菜展览为例[J].人文天下,2019,(05):67-73. [15] Lin B H,Dong D,Carlson A,et al.Potential dietary outcomes of changing relative prices of healthy and less healthy foods:The case of ready-to-eat breakfastcereals[J].Food Policy,2017,68:77-88. [16] 赵伟.中国方便面业的产业组织分析[D].南京:南京农业大学,2009. [17] Tan M,Lin Z,Zu Y,et al.Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles the quality of convenience sea cucumber:Emphatically on water status of by LF-NMR and MRI[J].Food Research International,2018,109:65-71. [18] 赵智远.栗蘑方便食品的开发及关键技术研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2011. [19] 朱红.城市家庭方便食品现状与发展[J].农牧产品开发,2006(8):17-18. [20] Contini C,Romano C,Scozzafava G,et al.Food habits and the increase in ready-to-eat and easy-to-prepare products[M].Food Hygiene and Toxicology in Ready-to-Eat Foods,Elsevier Inc,2016:3-14. [21] 张悦.国内外即食食品微生物标准对比研究[J].食品界,2018,(10):76-77. [22] 金征宇.我国方便食品的现状与发展趋势[J].食品工业科技,2011,32(4):53-56. [23] 耿凯平,王非,徐渝.推进以加工配送企业为核心的生鲜农产品供应链发展之浅见[J].现代财经:天津财经学院学报,2009,(3). [24] 魏薇.创新方便食品发展的关键[J].农产品加工(创新版),2012,(9):23-24. [25] 王雪.牛羊肉菜肴类方便食品的开发及品质控制[D].东北农业大学,2015. [26] 范晓攀,王娉,葛毅强.预制调理食品中的常见微生物及其防控[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(8):49-53,58. [27] Pettersen M K,Hansen A A,Mielnik M.Effect of different packaging methods on quality and shelf life of fresh reindeer meat[J].Packaging Technology and Science,2015,27(12): 987-997. [28] 赵越.红烧肉在加工和储藏过程中的品质变化研究[D].江南大学,2017. [29] 李肖婵.即食风味小龙虾的复合保鲜工艺研究[D].合肥工业大学,2020. [30] 黄雨萌,孙榕璟,闵伊妮,等.国内外食品包装材料标准体系对比研究[J].质量探索,2018,15(01):43-48. [31] 陆冰怡,刘宝林,刘志东,等.食品罐头包装材料研究进展[J].包装与食品机械,2021,39(04):46-51. [32] 陈弘.新环保背景下的软包装材料发展趋势[J].今日印刷,2019,(09):27-29. [33] 陈新欣,张春江,张泓,等.腊肉方便菜肴加工技术研究进展[J].肉类研究,2016,(3):33-38. [34] Stasiewicz M, Lipinski K, Cierach M.Quality of meat products packaged and stored under vacuum and modified atmosphere conditions[J].Journal of Food Science and Technology,2014,51(9):1982-1989. [35] Ozturk A, Yilmaz N, Gunes G. Effect of different modified atmosphere packaging on microbial quality,oxidation and colour of a seasoned ground beef product(meatball)[J].Packaging Technology andScience,2010,23(1):19-25. [36] 卜俊芝,徐迅.法式真空低温烹调方法研究现状[J].美食研究,2014,31(04):48-52. [37] 王安建,高帅平,田广瑞,等.真空包装对花生贮藏效果的影响[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(09):125-128. [38] 李琳娜,刘海龙,朱妞.鸡皮蛋真空包装技术的研究[J].中国包装工业,2012,(13):45-47. [39] 谢雅茜,方智毅,郭培俊,等.不同包装材料和真空度对真空包装大米脂肪酸值的影响[J].粮食储藏,2016,45(02):31-34. [40] 贺羽,王帅,金益,等.天然保鲜剂对低温肉制品的保鲜作用[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(01):177-182. [41] 田鸣华.软罐头方便菜肴的工业化生产[J].食品工业科技,2001,(05):69-70. [42] 段红敏.不同包装材料对酱卤类低温肉制品品质变化影响的研究[D].吉林农业大学,2014. [43] 段红敏,刘学军,刘媛,等.包装材料厚度对酱猪肘品质变化的影响[J].肉类工业,2014,(01):16-18. [44] 王朝晖,阚兴传,李鹏.我国食品包装容器与材料标准体系的发展[J].中国标准化,2009,(02):6-8. [45] 8种特殊的智能化食品包装材料有待普及[J].工程塑料应用,2016,44(03):149. [46] 王洪江,孙诚,曲颖.食品包装复合材料现状及发展趋势[J].包装与食品机械,2009,27(01):58-62. [47] 简艺文,雷洲琳,郭依帆.从环保角度浅析食品包装材料的安全性[J].绿色包装,2021,(09):57-59. [48] 王安建,高帅平,田广瑞,等.真空包装对花生贮藏效果的影响[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(09):125-128. [49] 朱海佩.新型食品贮藏保鲜技术研究[J].现代食品,2017,(05):82-84. [50] 朱迎春,李茜,马俪珍,等.不同包装方式和贮藏温度对牛肉保水性的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2016,37(22):15-19. [51] 林恒欣,裘晓华,王欢,等.脊腹褐虾方便食品在常温贮藏中的货架期预测分析[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版).2016,(05). [52] 黄海源,沈思远,施文正,等.不同包装材料对半干青鱼常温贮藏过程中品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2022,48(02):110-115. [53] 姜云,朱科学,郭晓娜.降低水分活度和脱氧包装对半干面常温货架期及品质的影响[J].食品与机械,2017,33(11):117-121. [54] 徐贞.香辣蟹常温保鲜包装工艺及货架期[D].江南大学,2017. [55] 崔国健.发酵兔肉香肠工艺条件及贮藏期品质变化研究[D].西南大学,2017. [56] Wei P,Zhu K,Cao J,et al.The inhibition mechanism of the texture deterioration of tilapia fillets during partial freezing after treatment with polys henols[J].Food Chem,2021.335:127647. [57] 鲁礼明,宋玉荣,李芳,等.冰箱环境下的猪肉微冻保鲜技术研究[J].日用电器,2020,(10):54-58. [58] 张伯男.风味鸡蛋干工艺优化及贮藏特性研究[D].天津农学院,2018. [59] 赵越.红烧肉在加工和储藏过程中的品质变化研究[D].江南大学,2017 [60] Zhang Q Q,Han Y Q, CaoJ X, et al. The spoilage of air packaged broiler meat during storage at normal and fluctuating storage temperatures[J].Poultry Science,2012,91(1):208-214. [61] 魏娜,晏梦溪,吴佳,等.常压和真空浓缩鸡汤的微冻贮藏特性[J].肉类研究,2020,34(12):75-80. [62] 王丽,杨博,张宝琪,等.黑龙江省农产品冷链物流发展现状及对策[J].江苏商论,2015,(12):29-30. [63] Yuasa M,Koe M,Maeda A, et al.Characterization of flavor component in Japanese convenience soup stocks‘dashi’[J].International Journal of Gastronomy&Food Science,2017,9:55-61. [64]乔引庄,张淑珍.熟肉制品二次灭菌各环节应注意的问题[J].肉类工业,2012(1):45-46. [65]孙晋跃,孙芝兰,吴海虹,等.非热杀菌技术在低温鸡肉制品致病菌控制中的应用研究进展[J].肉类研究,2020,34(8):84-90. [66] 刘悦,贺稚非,李洪军,等.非热杀菌技术在肉及肉制品中的应用研究进展[J].肉类研究,2020,(10):88-95. [67] 汤敏.不同包装德州扒鸡腐败菌鉴定及致腐特性[D].上海大学,2020. [68] 姜开新,马丽卿.杀菌技术在食品加工中的应用进展[J].食品安全导刊,2020,(17):37. [69] 张永进,于晓慧,林琳,等.巴氏灭菌后即食整肢小龙虾特定腐败菌的16S rRNA鉴定[C].第十届世界华人虾蟹养殖研讨会暨2016年中国河蟹产业发展高峰论坛论文集.2016:306-306. [70] 曹荣,刘淇,等.虾仁TPA质构分析及不同熟制加工方式对其品质的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2010,31(6):1-5. [71] NIAMUNY C,DEVAHASTIN S,SOPONRONNARIT S.Quality changes of shrimp during boiling in salt solution [J].Joumal of Food Science,2007,72(5):S289 S297. [72] 张怀珠,徐晓霞,彭涛,等.加热杀菌对八珍鸡翅根品质影响的研究[J].肉类工业,2015,(4):38-42. [73] 孙承锋,戴瑞彤,南庆贤.低温杀菌对真空包装酱牛肉货架期及品质的影响[J].食品科技,2003,(3):21-23. [74] 张永进,魏静,王伟,等.罐罐肉贮藏过程中品质影响的研究[D].四川农业大学,2015. [75] 片美惠,张燕,沈选举,叶秀友,王硕.基于臭氧技术的食品净化设备清洗对猪肉食用品质的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2022,43(13):121-127. [76] 美食杰[EB/OL].(2007-01)[2021-07-15] http://www.meishij.net/ [77] 贾丽娜.速冻调理回锅肉加工工艺及冻藏期间品质变化研究[D].江南大学,2015. [78] GB 5009.229-2016 食品安全国家标准 食品中酸价的测定 [79] GB 4789.2-2016 安全国家标准 食品微生物学检验菌落总数测定 [80] GB 5009.227-2016, 食品安全国家标准 食品中过氧化值的测定[S]. [81] 李肖婵,林琳,郑静静,等.不同复合包装材料对即食小龙虾品质的影响[J].中国调味品,2020,45(03):118-124. [82] 敖晓林,傅宝尚,祁立波,等. 不同包装材料对烤制鱿鱼贮藏品质的影响[J].食品工业科技,2020,41(16):279-285. [83] Diclehan K, Oguzhan U, Mehmet T.Electronic nose and its applications:A survey[J].International Journal of Automation and Computing,2020,17(2):179-209. [84] Wasilewski T, Gebicki J, Kamysz W.Bioelectronic nose:Current status and perspectives[J].Biosensors and Bioelectronices,2017,87:480-494. [85] Rayappan J B, Kulandaisamy A J, Ezhilan M, et al.Developments in electronic noses for quality and safety control[J].Advances in Food Diagnostics,2017:63-96. [86] 刘洋,贾文珅,马洁,等.电子鼻技术在肉与肉制品检测中的研究进展和应用展望[J].智慧农业,2021,3(04):29-41. [87] Hong X Z,Wang J,Hai Z. Discrimination and prediction of multiple beef freshness indexes based on electronic nose [J].Sensors and Actuators B:Chemical,2012,161(1):381-389 [88] Nurjuliana M,Che Man Y B,Mat Hashim D, et al.Rapid identification of pork for halal authentication using the electronic nose and gas chromatography mass spectrometer with headspace analyzer[J].Meat Science,2011,88(4):638-644. [89] 洪雪珍,王俊,周博,等.猪肉储藏时间的电子鼻区分方法[J].浙江大学学报,2010,36(5):568-572. [90] 巩芳娥,虎云青,任志勇,等.电子鼻对陇南核桃主栽品种风味物质的研究[J].中国林副特产,2020(05):1-6. [91] 任静,孙方达,程龙,等.电子鼻技术研究不同包装调理预制烤猪肉冷却贮藏过程中品质的变化[J].肉类研究,2016,30(05):30-35. [92] 李荣华.乳蛋白对凝固型酸奶流变学特性及微观结构的影响[D].东北农业大 学,2007. [93] 徐晔,刘诗宇,王艺伦,等.原料肉贮藏时间对牛肉发酵香肠中微生物菌相变化和蛋白质降解的影响[J].食品科学,2021,42(09):184-191. [94] 黎良菊,颜李秀.食品中油脂酸价的测定研究现状分析[J].现代食品,2020,(12):39-40. [95] 刘芳,王超,杨菊,等.油脂酸价和过氧化值检测方法的研究进展[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(14):4478-4482. [96] 廖定容.罐罐肉加工与贮藏过程中风味形成机理的初步研究[D].四川农业大学,2013. [97] 朱倩,贺慧琳,刘俊.食品中过氧化值检测方法的研究进展[J].食品安全刊,2021,(19):114-115. [98] 许立兴,薛晓东,仵轩轩,等.微冻及冰温结合气调包装对羊肉的保鲜效果[J].食品科学,2017,38(03):232-238. [99] 李昊阳.不同包装、包装条件对牛肉在贮藏期间品质的影响[D].大连工业大学,2017. [100] 陈少霞,周丹丹,潘磊庆,等.不同包装材料对娃娃菜贮藏过程中品质指标的影响[J].食品工业科技,2020,41(03):270-276-284. [101] 刘佳东.宰后牦牛肉成熟机理及肉用品质变化研究[D].甘肃农业大学,2011. [102] 罗章,马美湖,孙术国,等.西藏种萨牦牛与犏牛挥发性风味组分比较研究[J].食品科学2010,31(24):325-328. [103] 王永祥,张玉斌,韩玲,等.牦牛肝脏中脂肪含量与食用品质脂肪酸组成的相关性[J].食品科学,2014,35(6):164-167. [104] 郭艳婧.不同包装材料对罐罐肉贮藏过程中品质影响的研究[D].四川农业大学,2015. [105] 梁晓红,呼和,王羽,等.高阻隔复合膜对冷鲜肉货架期的影响[J].食品科技,2015,40(05):150-153. [106] 赵越,姜启兴,许艳顺,等.包装方式对红烧肉方便菜肴制品保鲜品质的影响[J].食品科技,2017,42(06):47-53. [107] Halamíčková, Alena, Malota, et al.Muscle Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance of the Atlantic Herring(Clupea harengus)in Marinades Collected in the Market Network[J].Acta Veterinaria Brno,2010. [108] Ruiz-Capillas C,Moral A.Correlation between biochemical and sensory quality indices in hake stored in ice[J].Food Research International,2001,34(5):441-447. [109] Kumar P, Ganguly S. Role of vacuum packaging in increasing shelf-life in fish processing technology[J].Asian Journal of Bio ence,2014,09:109-112. [110] 戴志远,崔雁娜,王宏海.不同冻藏条件下养殖大黄鱼鱼肉质构变化的研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2008,(08):188-191. [111] 潘秀娟.苹果采后质地变化的破坏与非破坏检测研究[D].南京农业大学,2004. [112] 陈能,谢黎虹,段彬伍.稻米中含二硫键蛋白对其米饭质地的影响[J].作物学报,2007,(01):167-170. [113] 李肖婵,林琳,朱亚军,等.巴氏杀菌和超高压杀菌对即食小龙虾货架期的影响[J].渔业现代化,2020,47(04):83-88. [114] Alonso Jcaney W&Rodriguez TThermal and calcium pretreatment affects texture,pectin esterase and pectic substances of frozen sweet cherriesJ.Food Science,1997,62(3):511-515. [115] 崔跃慧,范海潇,王甜,等.不同贮藏温度下调理猪肉饼货架期预测模型的建立[J].核农学报,2018,3(1):2355-2362. [116] 林静.水芹菜软包装产品加工工艺的研究[D]无锡江南大学2006 [117] 李芳学生餐加工过程中品质变化特性与质量保障[D]临安:浙江农林大学2014. |
开放日期: | 2022-08-25 |