乡村振兴战略的实施是党在十九大作出的重大决策部署，是新时代“三农”工作的总抓手，二十大提出进一步提出要全面推进乡村振兴，发展农村集体经济，拓宽农民增收致富渠道。农村集体经济的发展离不开政府、村两委、村民等多元主体共同参与，而在农村集体经济的发展过程中更多的是政府作为主导下达相应任务指标，村两委在农村集体经济发展中起决定作用，村民以被雇佣者的身份按照付出劳动获取报酬的方式参与其中。按照协同治理理论，则认为村民缺乏有效参与，而且这与发挥村民在乡村振兴中的主体作用，调动亿万村民的积极性相违背。

本文以Y市中心村集体经济发展现状为研究对象，以村民参与农村集体经济发展为研究内容，以协同治理综合模型为理论依据，分析村民参与农村集体经济的实际情况，得出外部环境施加影响不足、多元主体相互作用有限、协同引擎未能产生有效动力、多元主体缺乏采取协同行为、缺少评估与问责意识等五方面。分析产生的原因主要是政策引导不足，缺乏参与意愿；各方利益不同，缺乏激励措施；人员流失严重，参与能力不足；人员思维固化，缺乏开拓意识；多元主体缺失，协同难以形成等五方面。针对上述原因提出政府顶层设计，发挥主导作用；村委会加强自身学习，发挥基层党组织作用；村民扭转思想，发挥主体特质；其他主体协同参与，助力集体经济发展。以期通过上述建议达成多元主体构建协同治理的路径，实现发展农村集体经济、壮大农村集体经济效益的目的。

The implementation of the rural revitalization strategy is a major decision made by the Party in the 19th National Congress, is the new era of the "three farmers" work of the general starting point, the 20th National Congress further proposed to comprehensively promote rural revitalization, the development of rural collective economy, and broaden the channels for farmers to increase income and get rich. The development of the rural collective economy cannot be separated from the participation of multiple subjects such as the government, village committees and villagers. In the process of the development of the rural collective economy, the government is more dominant in assigning the corresponding task indicators, and the village committees play a decisive role in the development of the rural collective economy. Villagers participate in the development of the rural collective economy as employees in the way of getting paid for their work. According to the theory of collaborative governance, it is believed that villagers lack effective participation, and this is contrary to the principle of giving full play to the main role of villagers in rural revitalization and mobilizing the enthusiasm of hundreds of millions of villagers.

Therefore, this dissertation takes the actual development of collective economy in Y downtown village as the research object, takes villagers' participation in the development of the rural collective economy as the research content, and takes the comprehensive model of collaborative governance as the theoretical basis to analyze the actual situation of villagers' participation in the rural collective economy. It is concluded that there are five aspects: insufficient influence of external environment, limited interaction of multiple subjects, failure of synergy engine, lack of collaborative behavior of multiple subjects, and lack of awareness of evaluation and accountability. The main reasons are insufficient policy guidance and lack of willingness to participate. Different interests and lack of incentives; Serious personnel turnover and insufficient participation ability; Staff thinking solidified, lack of pioneering consciousness; There are five aspects, such as the lack of multiple subjects and the difficulty in forming coordination. In view of the above reasons, the top-level design of the government is proposed to play a leading role; Village committees should strengthen their own learning and play the role of basic party organizations. Villagers change their thoughts and give play to their main character; Other entities participated in a coordinated manner to boost collective economic development. Through the above suggestions, we hope to achieve the path of multi-subject building collaborative governance, and realize the purpose of developing rural collective economy and expanding rural collective economic benefits.

a.专著：
[1]习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利—在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告.北京：人民出版社，2017.
[2]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编.马克思恩格斯选集（第1卷）.北京：人民出版社，2012.
[3]国务院第七次人口普查领导小组办公室编，《2020年第七次全国人口普查主要数据》.北京：中央统计出版社，2021.
[4]宋涛.行政问责概念及内涵辨析.深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2005(02).
[5]卓越.政府绩效管理概论.北京：清华大学出版社，2007.
[6]《毛泽东选集》第4卷，人民出版社，1991.
[7]农业农村部政策与改革司，农村集体产权制度改革.北京：人民出版社，2020.
b.期刊论文：
[8]许经勇.农村新旧体制裂变与新型集体经济重建.学习论坛，2017(09):31-35.
[9]戴双兴.实施乡村振兴战略，壮大农村集体经济.思想理论教育导刊，2018(08):13-16.
[10]高强.农村集体经济发展的历史方位、典型模式与路径辨析.经济纵横,2020(07):42-51.
[11]胡梦瑶.怎样念好村级集体经济发展经.乡村振兴，2020(12):
88-89.
[12]夏英，钟桂荔，曲颂，等.我国农村集体产权制度改革试点：做法、成效及推进对策.农业经济问题，2018(04):36-42.
[13]李韬，陈丽红，杜晨玮，等.农村集体经济壮大的障碍、成因与建议——以陕西省为例.农业经济问题，2021(02):54-64.
[14]陈晓枫,钱翀.新型农村集体经济推进乡村治理现代化的机理与现实路径.当代经济研究,2024(01):46-56.
[15]王海南.农村集体经济改革的创新经验与启发——评《新时代农村经济体制的再改革》.中国农业资源与区划，2021(10):18+30.
[16]方志权.农村集体经济组织产权制度改革若干问题.中国农村经济,2014(07):4-14.
[17]钟宪章.空壳村发展壮大集体经济的理性思考.农业经济，2018
(12):27-29.
[18]詹向勇.试探金融支持村级集体经济发展的路径与方法.农村经济与科技，2020(22):129-130.
[19]赵忠亮.发挥农村基层党组织领导作用发展壮大村集体经济.中国集体经济，2021(30):1-2.
[20]孔祥智.乡村振兴离不开农民合作社.中国农民合作社，2018(03):53.
[21]吕宾.乡村振兴视域下乡村文化重塑的必要性、困境与路径.求实，2019(02):97-108+112.
[22]蔡文成.基层党组织与乡村治理现代化：基于乡村振兴战略的分析.理论与改革，2018(03):62-71.
[23]于金富，徐祥军.实践邓小平“两个飞跃”思想坚持发展集体经济.马克思主义研究，2010(10):34-41.
[24]李天姿，王宏波.农村新型集体经济：现实旨趣、核心特征与实践模式.马克思主义与现实，2019(02):166-171.
[25]赵黎.发展新型农村集体经济何以促进共同富裕——可持续发展视角下的双案例分析.中国农村经济，2023(08):60-83.
[26]刘伟忠.我国协同治理理论研究的现状与趋向.城市问题，2012
(05):81-85.
[27]孙萍，闫亭豫.我国协同治理理论研究述评.理论月刊，2013(03):107-112.
[28]张怀英，郭靓，李璐.多元主体协同参与下农村集体经济发展机制研究.重庆文理学院学报（社会科学版）,2023(03):1-19.
[29]苑鹏，刘同山.发展农村新型集体经济的路径和政策建议——基于我国部分村庄的调查.毛泽东邓小平理论研究，2016(10):23-28+91.
[30]黄振华.能人带动：集体经济有效实现形式的重要条件.华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2015(01):15-20.
[31]中共河南省委办公厅：农村基层组织建设的新探索.求是，2010
(01): 42-43.
[32]宋涛.行政问责概念及内涵辨析.深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2005(02):42-46.
[33]陈卫平，孙欣.数字治理平台对外出务工村民参与乡村治理的影响及其机制——基于技术赋能视角的实证研究.学术研究，2023(12):107-116+177.
[34]赵凤霞.绩效考核与绩效评估：内涵、价值及衔接转化.北京行政学院学报，2011(02):47-51.
[35]李传忠.关于完善乡村治理多元参与机制的思考——以协同治理理论为视角.闽南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2020(04):35-40.
[36]沈费伟，刘祖云.发达国家乡村治理的典型模式与经验借鉴.农业经济问题，2016(09):93-102+112.
[37]王世泰，余达淮.刍议中国农村集体经济发展的内生性动力及途径——基于共同富裕视野的考察.改革与战略，2023(03):132-140.
c.学位论文：
[38]田培杰.协同治理：理论研究框架与分析模型[博士学位论文].上海：上海交通大学,2014.
[39]王利云.乡村振兴的实践罗辑、理论逻辑和实现路径：发展新型农村集体经济的研究[博士学位论文].上海：上海财经大学，2021.
[40]肖纯柏.农村基层党组织功能实现途径研究[博士学位论文].北京：中共中央党校，2008.
[41]薛继亮.农村集体经济发展有效实现形式研究[博士学位论文].陕西：西北农林科技大学，2012.
[42]卢洋.中国农村集体经济实现形式研究[博士学位论文].四川：四川大学，2022.
d.电子文献：
[43]中共中央 国务院关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见，中国政府网，
2018-02-04，https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-02/04/co ntent_5263807.htm
[44]中共中央 国务院关于做好2023年全面推进乡村振兴重点工作的意见，中国政府网，2023-02-13，https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2023-02/13/content_5741370.htm
e.外文资料：
[45]Richard J. Sexton. Imperfect Competition in Agricultural Markets and the Role of Cooperatives: A Spatial Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1990,72(3):
[46]Murray Fulton. The Future of Canadian Agricultural Cooperatives: A Property Rights Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1995,77(5):
[47]John M. Staatz. The Cooperative as a Coalition: A Game-Theoretic Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1983,65(5)
[48]Feinerman Eli,Falkovitz Meira S. An agricultural multipurpose service cooperative: Pareto optimality, price-tax solution, and stability. Journal of Comparative Economics,1991,15(1):
[49]Kostas Karantininis,Angelo Zago. Endogenous Membership in Mixed Duopsonies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2001,83(5):
[50]Zusman Pinhas. Constitutional selection of collective-choice rules in a cooperative enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1992,17(3):
[51]Johnston Birchall,Richard Simmons. What Motivates Members to Participate in Co‐operative and Mutual Businesses Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,2004,75(3):
[52]Morgan P. Miles,John B. White,Linda S. Munilla. Strategic planning and agribusiness: an exploratory study of the adoption ofstrategic planning techniques by co-operatives. British Food Journal,1997,99(11):
[53]Lichtenthal J. David,Mary M. Long. Case study: service support and capital goods - dissolving the resistance to obtaining product acceptance in new business markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,1998,13(4/5):
[54]Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 543–571.
[55]Maria Fonte, Ivan Cucco.Cooperatives and alternative food networks in Italy.The long road towards a social economy in agriculture.Journal Of Rural Studies,2017,53:291-302.
[56]L.A.Ovchintseva.Case-study method in the studies of the Russian rural cooperation.Rudn Journ Al Of Sociology-Vestnik Rossiiskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov Seriya Sotsiologiya,2020,20(3):669-680.
[57]Piotr Nowak, Anna Jastrzębiec-Witowska, Krzysztof Gorlach.Cooperative movements in rural areas in contemporary Poland: a brief comparison of farmers' attitudes of members and non-memebrs of cooperatives.Eastern European Countryside,2016,22(1):151-164.
[58]Asaf Ozalp.Financial analysis of agricultural development cooperatives: a case of Western Mediterranean Region, Turkey.New Medit,2019,8(2):119-132
[59]A.Sobolev, A.Kurakin, V.Pakhomov, etc.Cooperation in Rural Russia: past, present and future.Mirrossii-Universe Of Russia,2018,27(1):65-89.