在韩国语中, ‘??’作为动词使用频率很高, 使用方法也很多, 既可以做本动词(???), 也可以做辅助动词(????). 汉语中 '给'的词性和使用方法也复杂多样. 本文在对 ‘??’和 '给'各自的意义和用法进行归纳的基础上, 运用对比语言学的理论和研究方法考察了韩国语动词 ‘??’和汉语 '给'的对比情况. 本文在绪论中首先指明了本文的研究对象, 研究目的和意义, 研究资料和研究方法, 以及前人在这方面的研究成果. 第二章中, 首先对 ‘??’和 '给'的意义分别进行了归纳整理, 并从意义角度对二者进行了对比. 其次以收集到的例句为基础, 从动词的价位角度分别归纳总结了 ‘??’和 '给'的基本句式, 并对各自句式中的各种成分及其特征进行了分析. 然后从功能角度对二者进行了对比. 最后从活用论角度对二者进行了对比, 主要分析了各自句式中的句子成分在疑问句, 命令句和共动句中的省略问题. 第三章中, 首先对辅助动词 ‘??’的特征进行了分析. 先分析了它的意义特征, 后又分析了它的功能特征, 分析了它的语法功能, 与主语的结合关系以及与先行动词的关系特征. 然后分析了虚词 '给'的特征, 分别对介词 '给'和 助词 '给'的意义和功能进行了分析. 最后从对比的角度对 ‘??’和 虚词 '给'分别在语法意义, 语法功能以及在句中的位置关系上作了对比. 在第四章结论中, 主要对本文所述的内容进行了概括总结, 指出了文中的不足之处以及以后的努力方向.

In Korea , the frequency of ‘??' is very high, the operation method is much, in Chinese '给' of the phrase also sophisticates variety with operation method. This text application contrasts the philological theories with study does the method investigated Korea verb ‘??’ with the Chinese '给' of contrast circumstance. First of all, this text indicated the textual research object first inintroduction, studying the purpose with the meaning, study the datawith study the method,and in this respect research in people of thepast result. In chapter two, firstly analyzed ‘给’and its meaning proceeds to induce the sorting respectively, and to two proceeded the contrast. The next in order from the price angle of the verb induced to tallyup the ‘给' and its basic type, and every kind of composition withindistich type and its characteristics proceeded the analysis. Then from the function angle to two preceded the contrast. Finally from live use to talk about the angle to two proceeded the contrast. In chapter, firstly, assist the auxiliary verb ‘ ??' of the characteristic proceeded the analysis.The meaning characteristic that analyzed it, function characteristic with phrasing function, relate towiththe combination of the main language and with in advance the relation of the verb. Then analyzed '给'of characteristic, distinguishto the preposition'给'with an auxiliary ‘给'of the meaning proceeded the analysis with function. Finally from the angle of the contrastto ‘??' and '给' made the contrast. In the last chaper, the authou proceeded to generalize the summaryto this text a contents for saying, point out the text inside not enough to impose and hereafter of diligent direction.