生育权是社会中每个成员都应当享有的基本权利，关乎个人的发展和文明的延续。服刑人员因犯罪行为受到法律的惩罚被囚禁在高墙之中，但他们的基本权利仍应得到尊重。我国现有的法律中，鲜有涉及服刑人员生育权的规定。随着权利意识的提高，我国出现服刑人员要求行使生育权的司法案件。因为缺乏服刑人员行使生育权的法律规定和制度保障，使得服刑人员生育权保护步履维艰。本文以服刑人员的生育权为研究对象，通过对司法实践中的典型案例进行分析，总结出我国服刑人员行使生育权所面临的主要问题，并提出切实可行的建议。

第一章介绍了以服刑人员生育权的法律保护为研究方向的背景与意义，并且阐述了国内外相关领域的研究现状。因为没有明确的法律规定，我国服刑人员的生育权缺乏保护。同时，随着理论研究的推进,部分国家服刑人员生育权从不被法院支持到逐步被接受。

第二章从服刑人员生育权的概念、内容、属性和保护价值方面阐述服刑人员与普通公民之间行使生育权的区别。服刑人员的生育权保护存在障碍是因为其人身受到限制。但是，服刑人员的生育权具有保护的价值。不但有利于维护法律的公平和正义，同样有利于服刑人员接受改造。

第三章通过研究具有代表性的司法案例，对比和分析得出服刑人员行使生育权的司法现状，运用法理知识进行分析后得出，服刑人员人身自由受限制与行使生育权不必然冲突。在限定情形下，服刑人员行使生育权不违反男女平等。服刑人员行使生育权与其子女权益保障不冲突。此外，提出了我国服刑人员生育权保障的困境。

第四章针对我国服刑人员生育权保障的困境提出具有实践价值的若干建议。第一，明确服刑人员能够行使生育权，但是需要限定权利行使范围。第二，提出改良离监探亲制度、重启同居会见制度和许可使用辅助生殖技术，为限制人身自由的服刑人员提供可行的权利行使方式。第三，结合国情，提出由政府和社会组织对服刑人员未成年子女提供帮扶。第四，完善服刑人员行使生育权的救济途径。

生育权是社会中每个成员都应当享有的基本权利，关乎个人的发展和文明的延续。服刑人员因犯罪行为受到法律的惩罚被囚禁在高墙之中，但他们的基本权利仍应得到尊重。我国现有的法律中，鲜有涉及服刑人员生育权的规定。随着权利意识的提高，我国出现服刑人员要求行使生育权的司法案件。因为缺乏服刑人员行使生育权的法律规定和制度保障，使得服刑人员生育权保护步履维艰。本文以服刑人员的生育权为研究对象，通过对司法实践中的典型案例进行分析，总结出我国服刑人员行使生育权所面临的主要问题，并提出切实可行的建议。

第一章介绍了以服刑人员生育权的法律保护为研究方向的背景与意义，并且阐述了国内外相关领域的研究现状。因为没有明确的法律规定，我国服刑人员的生育权缺乏保护。同时，随着理论研究的推进,部分国家服刑人员生育权从不被法院支持到逐步被接受。

第二章从服刑人员生育权的概念、内容、属性和保护价值方面阐述服刑人员与普通公民之间行使生育权的区别。服刑人员的生育权保护存在障碍是因为其人身受到限制。但是，服刑人员的生育权具有保护的价值。不但有利于维护法律的公平和正义，同样有利于服刑人员接受改造。

第三章通过研究具有代表性的司法案例，对比和分析得出服刑人员行使生育权的司法现状，运用法理知识进行分析后得出，服刑人员人身自由受限制与行使生育权不必然冲突。在限定情形下，服刑人员行使生育权不违反男女平等。服刑人员行使生育权与其子女权益保障不冲突。此外，提出了我国服刑人员生育权保障的困境。

第四章针对我国服刑人员生育权保障的困境提出具有实践价值的若干建议。第一，明确服刑人员能够行使生育权，但是需要限定权利行使范围。第二，提出改良离监探亲制度、重启同居会见制度和许可使用辅助生殖技术，为限制人身自由的服刑人员提供可行的权利行使方式。第三，结合国情，提出由政府和社会组织对服刑人员未成年子女提供帮扶。第四，完善服刑人员行使生育权的救济途径。

The right to reproduce is a fundamental right that every member of society should enjoy, and is related to the development of the individual and the continuation of civilization. Prisoners were once imprisoned in the high wall because of criminal behavior punished by law, but their basic rights should still be respected. There are few provisions in our existing laws that deal with the reproductive rights of prisoners. As awareness of their rights has increased, judicial cases have arisen in China in which Prisoners claiming their reproductive rights.The protection of prisoners' reproductive rights has been difficult due to the lack of legal provisions and institutional safeguards for the exercise of their reproductive rights. This paper takes the maternity rights of imprisoned persons as the object of research, and through the analysis of typical cases in judicial practice, summarizes the main problems faced by imprisoned persons in exercising their maternity rights and puts forward practicable suggestions.
  Chapter 1 introduces the background and significance of taking the legal protection of the reproductive rights of imprisoned persons as the direction of the selected topic, and describes the current research status of related fields at home and abroad. Because there is no clear legal regulation at present, there is a lack of protection for the reproductive rights of imprisoned persons in China. At the same time, with the advancement of theoretical research, the reproductive rights of prisoners in some countries have been gradually accepted from not being supported by the court.
    Chapter 2 describes the difference in the exercise of reproductive rights between prison inmates and ordinary citizens in terms of the concept, content, attributes and protective value of prisoners' reproductive rights. The obstacles to protecting reproductive rights of persons serving prison sentences are due to the restrictions placed on their person. However, the reproductive rights of prisoners have a protective value. Not only does it contribute to the fairness and justice of the law, but it is also conducive to the rehabilitation of the inmates.
     Chapter 3 through the study of representative judicial cases, comparison and analysis of the exercise of the reproductive rights of prisoners of the judicial status quo, the use of jurisprudence knowledge to analyze and conclude that restricting personal freedom and exercising reproductive rights of prisoners are not necessarily in conflict. Under limited circumstances, the exercise of the right to procreate by a prisoner does not violate equality between men and women. There is no conflict between the exercise of the right to procreate and the protection of the rights and interests of their children. In addition, the dilemma of guaranteeing the reproductive rights of prisoners in China is put forward.
     Chapter 4 puts forward a number of recommendations of practical value to address the difficulties in safeguarding the reproductive rights of serving prisoners in China. First, it is clarified that prisoners can exercise their right to procreate, but the scope of the exercise of the right needs to be limited. Secondly, it proposes to improve the system of visiting relatives outside prison, reintroduce the cohabitation meeting system and authorize the use of assisted reproduction technology, so as to provide a feasible way to exercise the right for those who have been restricted in their personal freedom. Thirdly, in the light of national conditions, it is proposed that the Government and social organizations should provide assistance to the minor children of persons serving prison sentences. Fourthly, it improves the remedies for serving prisoners to exercise their reproductive rights.
 

一、著作类：
[1]冯建仓.服刑人员权利保护研究.中国检察出版社,2016
[2]杨帆.我国监狱服刑人员权利保障研究.知识产权出版社,2013
[3]冯一文.中国服刑人员权利保障研究.法律出版社,2010
[4]冀祥德.遏制监所暴力与监所体制改革.社会科学文献出版社,2014
[5]孙平.监狱亚文化.社会科学文献出版社,2013
[6]戴艳玲.中国监狱制度的改革与发展.中国人民公安大学出版社,2010
[7]瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会.商务印书馆出版,2010
[8]潘迪.生殖革命与人权.知识产权出版社,2015
[9]湛中乐.生育自由与人权保障.中国法制出版社,2013
[10]胡玉鸿.人权视野中的弱者保护.中国政法大学出版社,2012
[11]杨立新.人格权法.法律出版社,2020
[12]周祖勇.环境改造:现代中国监狱改造罪犯的重要路径.法律出版社,2012
[13]徐显明.人权研究,山东人民出版社,2010
[14]翟中东.刑罚问题的社会学思考方法及运用.法律出版社,2010
[15]张千帆,曲相霏.宪法与人权指南.中国人民大学出版社,2012
[16]付子堂.法理学进阶.法律出版社,2022
[17]黄丁全.医疗、法律与生命伦理.法律出版社,2015
[18]张明楷.刑法学.法律出版社,2021
[19]卡尔·威尔曼.人权的道德维度，商务印书馆，2018
[20]李玉娥,栗志杰,任建通.罪犯权利实现研究.中国政法大学出版社,2018

二、期刊论文：
[21]李玉娥,栗志杰.服刑人员生育权论要.法律科学,2018(01)
[22]葛向伟.《联合国囚犯待遇最低限度标准规则》及其修订.犯罪与改造研究,2019(12)
[23]李蕊佚.服刑人员生育权研究.法学评论,2010(04)
[24]叶旺春.英国监狱社会监督制度的考察以及对我国的借鉴价值,刑法论丛,2011(01)
[25]王春姣.监狱服刑女性生育权保护研究.齐齐哈尔大学学报,2017(09)
[26]刘箭.我国服刑人员和被羁押人员民事权利保障机制研究[J].华中科技大学学报.2014(06)
[27]路正.论夫妻生育权的性别分离.山东青年政治学院学报，2021(03)
[28]陈雅凌.夫妻生育权冲突之对策研究.中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2021(01)
[29]张建文,高完成.司法裁判视域中的优生选择权:性质、主体及救济.人权研究,2020(01)
[30]关人蕾.试论我国死刑犯的生育权问题.边疆经济与文化,2016(01)
[31]王坤.对死刑犯生育权问题的思考.法制与社会.2016(06)
[32]郑惠文.试析监狱中罪犯权利问题.法制与经济,2013(09)
[33]杨帆.关于死刑犯权利保障问题的思考与研究.中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2011(01)
[34]张静,张志强.宪法理念在民法典中的具体表达.江淮法治,2021(04)
[35]武秀英.对生育权的法律阐释.山东社会科学,2014(08)
[36]肖洪永.中国古代死刑观的人性基础.法学家,2012(06)
[37]余枫霜.论被判死刑人员结婚和生育的权利.南京师大学报,2013(06)
[38]钱熠.论服刑人员的民事权利.湖北警官学院学报,2013(08)

三、学位论文：
[39]杨帆.我国监狱服刑人员权利研究.武汉大学博士论文,2012
[40]王淇.关于生育权的理论思考.吉林大学博士论文,2012

四、外文文献：
[41]Susan Baidawi.Older prisoners：Challenges for inmates and prison management.Duke University Press Journal,2015
[42]E.Jackson,Conception and the Irrelevawe of the Welfare Principle,Modern Law Review,65